Group work in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics courses is an effective means of improving student outcomes, and many different factors can influence the dynamics of student discussions and, ultimately, the success of collaboration. The substance and dynamics of group discussions are commonly examined using qualitative methods such as discourse analysis. To complement existing work in the literature, we developed a quantitative methodology that uses graph theory to map the progression of talk-turns of discussions within a group.
Recent Posts
- Melinda Owens uncovers what biology students know about vaccine mechanisms
- Ella Tour investigates how students analyze figures and propose follow-up experiments
- Ashley Juavinett writes about the need for coding in neuroscience education
- Claire Meaders identifies top student questions about STEM success and how to answer them
- Claire Meaders digs into what works on the first day of class

